Commentary for Bava Batra 341:3
רב יוסף אמר בשטר מתנה
deeds in respect of one field! — R. Joseph replied: [This<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The issue by witnesses of a second, or subsequent deed bearing the date of the original one. ');"><sup>7</sup></span> is permitted only] in [the case of] a deed of gift.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Such a deed does not entitle its holder to the seizure of any property, and the date is therefore, of no consequence. ');"><sup>8</sup></span> And Rabbah replied: [Even] in [the case of] a deed [of sale] which does not contain [the clause] pledging [property].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Such a deed does not entitle its holder to the seizure of any property, and the date is therefore, of no consequence. ');"><sup>8</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Batra 341:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.